
File
No: 08-08-008 Location: Wysox, PA
– Bradford County
Investigation Date and Duration:
November
7th, 2008 Arrive 6:30 PM /
Depart 10:30 PM
Reported
Activity:
Clients
reported activity spanning at least four years, starting in an old house
that had burned down two years ago and was later replaced with a house
trailer in the same spot, which they currently live in. Claims of
activity included strange sensations, strange marks appearing on one of
the clients, seeing what the clients believe were apparitions,
anomalous objects showing up in digital pictures and hearing voices.
The clients also presented a video from a local paranormal
investigation group, who claim they captured a sheet being pulled off
one of the children by some unknown entity, a laugh recorded in the
master bedroom, and a small white flash captured in the hallway on
video. During the time of the event, the client reports that the
investigation team left their equipment running while the family slept
and left the residence until morning.
Location Status:
This
is a three bedroom house trailer occupied by two adults and four
children.
Equipment:
DVR System with four IR cameras Digital
Cameras (1)
Digital Voice Recorders (2)
EMF gauge (2)
PC ComputerCamcorders
w/ night shot (1)
IR Boosters (1)
Flashlights Motion
Sensor (2)
Investigators
Present:
Mark
Rich

Location Weather:
Mild,
clear and moonlit.
Technical Notes:
None
EVP
(Electronic Voice Phenomenon) Audio:
Recorder #1 (Digital)
No physical evidence captured on this device at the time of the
investigation. Recorder was stationary in the children’s
bedroom.
Recorder #2 (Digital)
No physical evidence captured on this device at the time of the
investigation. Recorder was stationary on a dresser in the master
bedroom.
Video: DVR
Cam1 - (Dinette area of
kitchen facing kitchen) No physical evidence captured on this device at the time
of the investigation.
DVR Cam2 -
(Dinette area of kitchen facing living room, hallway and main bathroom)
DVR Cam2 captured activation of the motion sensor, placed just inside the bathroom on the floor, at 9:34 PM and
two subsequent times, all within a minute time span. No one was present
in the home at the time.
DVR Cam3 - (Master
bedroom facing bathroom) No physical evidence captured on this device
at the time of the investigation.
DVR Cam4 -
(Children’s bedroom facing bunk beds) No physical evidence
captured on this device at the time of the investigation. Camcorder #1
– (Mobile with
investigators) No physical evidence captured on
this device at the time of the investigation.
Photographs:
No photos of evidential value were
discovered.
EMF (Electro Magnetic
Field):
Standard
baseline readings were taken throughout the residence and outlying
areas with expected spikes near electrical appliances. No abnormal
readings were present during the investigation.
Investigator Feelings /
Experiences
Mark – None
Rich -
None
Conclusion:
Investigators from ThePPA
analyzed the video that was presented by the client, which reportedly
contained several clips of a sheet being pulled off a young child from
her left side in the camera shot as she slept. The time of the first
clip indicated it was recorded at 2:04 AM. It is quite obvious that
there is something under the sheet (most probably a string) pulling it
towards the bottom of the bed. The second clip is only ten minutes
later, but shows the covers neatly pulled back up to the child neck and
the child is still in the same position as earlier. This time the sheet
can be seen being pulled from the right of the child in the camera shot
and only runs for about five seconds. The last clip is about an hour
later. Again, the sheet is pulled back up to the child’s neck
and appears as if something under the covers is pulling the sheet down
on the right side of the child, towards the end of the bed. At one point
during this movement, a loud snap can be heard and the tension point on
the sheet jumps back in the opposite direction, as if a string snapped,
and the video then ends.
The
laugh that was reportedly captured in the master bedroom was analyzed
next and, after being compared to recorded audio from our investigation,
it is believed to be a barking dog outside the residence.
Finally,
the white flash that appeared on video in the hallway is believed to be
common dust that always shows up on camera under infrared lighting.
Taking
into account that the client denies any involvement in the video, it is
the opinion of ThePPA that this was a fraudulent video submitted to the
client by the local paranormal group and can not be considered viable
proof of a haunting.
During our investigation of this
property, we had an occurrence where one of our motion sensors activated
three times within a minute time period. No one was in the
residence at the time and we later discovered this event during the
review of the DRV recordings. This alone does not constitute paranormal
activity, but we could not find any reason for the activations.
A final
factor in this investigation was information obtained during an
interview with the clients that drug use was occurring or had occurred
by the clients, which may be a contributing cause for anxiety and other
psychological experiences, such as hearing voices or seeing things move.
No
proof of paranormal activity or a haunting was discovered on this
particular investigation date, but at the request of the client, we are
putting her in touch with an outside source for spiritual counseling.
Copyright
© 2014 The
Pennsylvania Paranormal AssociationTM
All rights reserved.
All
content is the property of this website and The Pennsylvania
Paranormal AssociationTM
|
|